Yesterday I read a fascinating article in The New York Times Magazine about the writer Marilynne Robinson. She has been teaching the art of writing at the University of Iowa, known for its fine writing program, since 1989. You may recognize her name from her Pulitzer Prize winning novel "Gilead". Her most recent novel is "Lila", which continues the saga of the residents of the mythical community of Gilead.
Much of what she had to say resonated with me, but a couple of comments in particular gave me pause. She talked about growing up with teachers who encouraged her to build a mind she could live with, that one's mind is a place, that we must live with our minds our entire lives so we should build a mind that is .... well, more heaven than it is hell.
Think of that: one's mind is a PLACE. We alone are responsible for building a mindplace we can live with. Not only live with, but thrive in. That's the point I think. Now I am not advocating that one disappear into a fantasy world, nor is she, but what we think, how we think, can definitely affect how we live in this world. Solitude can be a lovely place to reside if we have built a habitable mind, a mindplace. I like that idea: a mindplace.
Marilynne Robinson is an exceptional writer, and it is clear from the interview that she has made her mind a great place in which to live. I want to thank her for opening my own thoughts to the care of my mindplace.
To read the full article go to The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/magazine/the-revelations-of-marilynne-robinson
Monday, October 6, 2014
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Dayton:Aspen, Aspen:Dayton?
There's a new museum in Aspen. Yes, that Aspen, the town in Colorado probably better known for skiing than art. More precisely put, there's a new museum building in Aspen, as the original Aspen Art Museum opened in 1979 in the European model of a Kunsthalle. In general, a Kunsthalle does not have a permanent collection. Instead it mounts temporary shows, hosts symposiums and workshops and features artists.
This is a model that works for a lot of cities, as pointed out this past Sunday by Holland Cotter of The New York Times. He notes that Aspen's modestly sized museum has no permanent collection and is a potential working model for a lot of small to medium size cities between the coasts.
According to Mr. Cotter: ...."why settle for being a New York-Los Angeles outpost? Why not take advantage of the excitements that regional consciousness can offer, and by doing so chip away at the tired East Coast-West Coast hegemony?
The Aspen Art Museum’s founders were wise to create a noncollecting, community-serving museum on the classic European kunsthalle model, a model that assures that even residents of small cities have access to art and some say about the choice of it."
A facility like this does not have to buy art or maintain a collection. It can stay fresh in this way and promote talented regional artists. He notes that not every artist is driven to go to the large art centers and that smaller communities also have busy art scenes.
Aspen's new museum has its issues; it is not perfect. But it does offer a model for smaller metros: the idea of incubating spaces with pop-up, local shows that are exciting, thought-provoking, and supported by their communities. There is art excitement in one's hometown, and it's time more people understood that. Dayton, in the artistic sense, could be the next Aspen.
To read Mr. Cotter's full article on the Aspen museum: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/arts/design/a-museum-is-in-aspen-but-not-of-it.html?ref=design
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)